Performance Evaluations Need Help:
A recent Adobe survey of a wide range of employees showed that 88% of respondents were involved in a performance review process. This means that almost everyone in the corporate world is involved in a performance appraisal process in one way or another. The same survey also revealed that managers involved in these programs spend an average of 17 hours per employee to prepare for performance appraisals, while 59%of them believe that performance appraisals "do not affect the way they do business" and describe this process as a "Human Resources Drudgery". Taken together, performance appraisal systems do indeed seem to have a dark shadow over them.
TheSociety forHuman Resources Management (SHRM) also reports that 95% of employees are dissatisfied with their company's performance appraisal process. According to the report, 90% of employees do not believe that the performance appraisal process reveals accurate information. I think the statistics in surveys like these explain why companies like Adobe, GE and The Gap are seriously rethinking traditional performance appraisal systems or scrapping them altogether.
These startling statistics do not, of course, mean that performance appraisal programs should be done away with altogether. Employees still want to know whether they are succeeding at their jobs, and they still want to receive meaningful feedback. Bill George, who teaches the Leadership Course at Harvard Business School, puts it this way: "The starting point of leadership is self-awareness." Indeed, many other researchers have commented that self-awareness may be more important to a leader's success than "business management training". People with self-awareness are able to learn and improve themselves. If one is not open-minded, development and growth are blocked. My experience in business life also confirms these 2 principles about performance: 1) Employees want meaningful feedback and (2) Understanding other people's perspectives on your performance is vital to your leadership potential, personal development and good management practices.
How to Quickly Improve Your Performance Appraisal Process:
For the reasons mentioned above, we at Success Programme always use a performance assessment tool in our work to support and enhance the impact of a company's existing performance assessment process. We see this tool as an additional solution that provides actionable data without interrupting existing processes. The solution we use in this regard is a multi-rater (360 Degree) questionnaire that measures the performance competencies of employees at all levels . The questionnaire is designed to provide information about a person's performance and potential and includes items that also measure the employee's likelihood of future success (i.e. potential).
Why Do These Solutions Work?
A standard performance appraisal process is designed to ensure that an employee and their manager understand 2 important things:
(1) How aligned is the employee with the organization's goals, culture and strategy (Fit);
(2) How much do the individual's personal efforts contribute toteam and organizational success (Success).
The questionnaire we use is designed to not only help answer these 2 questions about relevance and success, but also to measure a person's future potential.
Some research suggests that understanding the potential of your employees may be more important than identifying employees who are already performing well. Therefore, it is preferable to present indicators for both data.
Typical performance appraisal programs are based on a variety of different processes, rangingfrom business metrics (e.g. achievement of sales targets) to deep analysis of an individual's strengths and weaknesses. Here are some of the most common performance management methods:
In addition to these widely used methods, organizations sometimes want to organize and develop programs to suit their specific needs. There are many more performance appraisal programs in use around the world to meet this need. Among the many options available, employees generally prefer the 360-degree feedback survey, which is the first thing that comes to mind when thinking of a multi-rater program. Standard "Multi-rater Feedback Programs" solicit feedback and information from various people around the person in question (i.e. the participant). Feedback may be solicited from the person's supervisor, coworkers, subordinates or other categories. Some professionalsavoid a multi-rater performanceprocess because it requires input from too many people and is difficult to implement and monitor.
These advantages include the fact that the process is more legally sound, as the 360-degree questionnaire is answered by more than one evaluator and the results are not based on the observations of only 1-2 people. On the other hand, employees also appreciate knowing that feedback is not dependent on 1-2 people. The evaluation can come from a variety of sources, from coworkers to people who have the employee's best interests at heart.Due to the nature of multi-rater systems, the evaluation criteria are fixed for each person. In addition, the tool focuses on well-defined competencies rather than on personal assessments that are prone to bias. By inviting external groups of evaluators to participate in the process, the reach of the program can be extended to potential customers, vendors, etc.
As a result, users are provided with a robust analysis tool. This allows HR managers and analysts to examine the data and discover hidden areas where things are not going well. As I mentioned earlier, our questionnaires are designed to assess not only performance but also a person's potential. The analysis tool can be used to assess on 9 levels. The 9-box method enables HR professionals and those involved in promotion planning to visualize data, making it easier to quickly identify and track well-performing employees.
Conclusion:
For professionals conducting staff assessments, this solution is an easy way to collect actionable data to make decisions, tailor training development programs or plan for promotions. These tools also help to streamline and automate the process without disrupting existing programs and systems. Employees want to improve and need feedback to guide them. The key to unlocking the potential of your people is to provide managers and employees with meaningful data that guides them in building on strengths and closing performance gaps.
While some pundits gleefully proclaim that the performance appraisal process is dead, in reality, if you work in a modern, data-driven workplace and deal with data-savvy employees, performance appraisal is far from dead - in fact, it is an invaluable data source and management tool. However, it is critical to redesign and strengthenthe performance appraisal process with technology, systems and data collection methods that improve it forboth the individual and the organization .
What are the strengths and weaknesses of the performance evaluation methods you use in your company? Please share your views with us.
Other Resources You May Be Interested In: